THE ABSENCE OF SEXUAL ANTAGONISM AND AGGRESSION IN RELATIONS
BETWEEN THE SEXES
Freeman (1968) reports that Iban women are envious of Iban men
and the mockery of males, particularly male genitalia, is one of
their favorite pastimes. And he points out the aggressive nature
of mockery. Swartz (1958) argues that on Truk the expression of
aggression is not permitted in marital relations. However, in adulterous
relations, "sweetheart relations", aggression is permitted,
and it is directed not only toward one's sweetheart but also to
the kin of the sweetheart by the very act of this illicit intercourse.
Swartz writes (1958:482), "The refusal consciously to characterize
acts as aggressive allows the sweethearts to inflict considerable
bodily harm on each other. ... The pain inflicted on each other
by sweethearts is now mostly limited to cigarette burns on the arm,
but formerly included cutting with a knife and knocking out teeth
with stones." And among the Trobriand Islanders, Malinowski
reports (1932:217, orig. 1929) that "It is a general rule in
all districts ... when a boy and girl are strongly attracted to
each other, and especially before their passion is satisfied, the
girl is allowed to inflict considerable bodily pain on her lover
by scratching, beating, thrashing, and even wounding with a sharp
instrument."9
Among the Rungus there is no evidence that females envy males,
or vice versa, and there is no evidence of an underlying layer of
aggression or antagonism with respect to the opposite sex as represented
in mockery, jokes, overt statements, or the play of children. Boys
do not tease girls or belittle female roles, and girls in their
play do not tease boys or ridicule any of the male roles. Nor is
there any association of aggression in coitus in terms of bodily
injury either in cases of fornication, adultery, or marital intercourse.
There is no evidence or discussion of marks rendered on a partner's
body during passionate intercourse. Aggression in coitus was never
a matter of discussion among the Rungus, and we have no observational
data to suggest that it occurs.10
There is also no evidence of sexual antagonism or aggression in
the myths we have collected, with two exceptions. These are the
myth of illicit sex that results in an elongated penis, subsequently
scalded when it continues to misbehave, and the ambiguous report
of a woman hurt in the act of intercourse, which may or may not
have been forced.
This is not to be read that spouses do not have arguments, and
that these sometimes result in the woman or man being hit, although
this latter case occurs less frequently. But sexual antagonism and
aggression is not part of the fabric of everyday relations between
the sexes.
|